Specification Comparison Table | Key-Differences
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 Vs Helio G88 Specification Comparison – These are two processors from Qualcomm and Mediatek known for their exceptional performance and efficiency. Both of these processors have been designed with advanced features and capabilities to provide users with top-notch performance and speed.
However, their architecture, manufacturing process, and other features differ, which can impact their performance and user experience.
In this article, we’ll compare the Mediatek Helio G88 Vs Snapdragon 680 processors, focusing on their features, performance, benchmark scores, and other important aspects.
Whether you’re a tech enthusiast, gamer, or business professional, knowing these differences can help you choose the best smartphone or device for your needs.
You can also check its ranking on the Best Mobile Processor Ranking List. Additionally, you can use our Processor Comparison Tool to compare any processor to another.
CPU – The Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 and MediaTek Helio G88 processors are both octa-core processors with eight cores. However, they differ in terms of their manufacturing process technology. The Snapdragon 680 is built on a 6nm process, while the Helio G88 is built on a 12nm process. This difference in process technology can have an impact on the performance, power efficiency, and overall capabilities of the processors.
In terms of CPU configuration, the Snapdragon 680 uses a 4x 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) and 4x 1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) setup, while the Helio G88 uses a 2x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The Snapdragon 680 has a higher high-frequency clock speed of 2400 MHz compared to the Helio G88’s 2000 MHz clock speed.
Another difference between the two processors is their storage type. The Snapdragon 680 supports both eMMC and UFS 2.2 storage types, while the Helio G88 only supports eMMC 5.1 storage. These differences in specifications may impact the overall performance, efficiency, and capabilities of the two processors in different ways.
GPU – When it comes to the GPU, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 uses an Adreno 610 GPU, while the MediaTek Helio G88 uses an ARM Mali-G52 MC2 GPU. The Helio G88 has a slightly higher GPU frequency of 1000 MHz, while the Snapdragon 680 has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz. The Snapdragon 680 uses Adreno 600 GPU architecture, while the Helio G88 uses Bifrost architecture.
In terms of video encoding, both processors support H.264, H.265/HEVC, and VP9 and VP8. However, the Helio G88 also supports VP-9. For video playback, both processors can handle up to 1080p resolution at 60fps. Overall, the differences in GPU specifications between the Snapdragon 680 and Helio G88 may impact their ability to handle graphics-intensive tasks such as gaming and video rendering.
Memory – The Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 and MediaTek Helio G88 processors both support LPDDR4x RAM. However, there are differences in their RAM specifications. The Snapdragon 680 has a higher RAM frequency of 2133 MHz compared to the Helio G88’s 1800 MHz. Both processors support a maximum of 8 GB RAM.
The Snapdragon 680 has a higher maximum bandwidth of 17 Gbit/s compared to the Helio G88’s 13.41 Gbit/s. Both processors have a bus speed of 2×16 Bit, which means they use a dual-channel interface to connect to the RAM. The differences in RAM specifications between the Snapdragon 680 and Helio G88 could impact the speed and efficiency of tasks that require a lot of memory, such as multitasking and running multiple apps simultaneously.
Connectivity – Both the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 and MediaTek Helio G88 processors come with built-in cellular modems. The Snapdragon 680 uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon X11 LTE modem, while the Helio G88 uses a Mediatek 4G modem.
The Snapdragon 680 supports a range of cellular technologies such as TD-SCDMA, LTE TDD support for CBRS, LTE TDD, CDMA 1x, EV-DO, GSM/EDGE, LTE FDD, WCDMA (DC-HSDPA), and WCDMA (DC-HSUPA). The Helio G88 also supports a range of cellular technologies, including 4G carrier aggregation (CA), CDMA2000 1x/EVDO Rev. A (SRLTE), 4G FDD/TDD, and HSPA+.
In terms of download speed, the Snapdragon 680 can achieve up to 390 Mbps, which is higher than the Helio G88’s maximum download speed of 300 Mbps. However, the Helio G88 can still provide fast download speeds for most users.
When it comes to upload speed, the Snapdragon 680 has a maximum upload speed of 150 Mbps, while the Helio G88 has a maximum upload speed of 100 Mbps. These differences in cellular modem and connectivity specifications may impact the performance and speed of tasks such as browsing the internet, streaming videos, and making voice or video calls.
Wireless System – Both the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 and MediaTek Helio G88 processors come with built-in wireless systems. The Snapdragon 680 uses the Qualcomm FastConnect 6100 wireless system, while the Helio G88 uses a MediaTek wireless system. The Snapdragon 680 supports Wi-Fi bands such as 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, and 802.11ac. The Helio G88 supports Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) and WiFi-5.
When it comes to Bluetooth, the Snapdragon 680 has Bluetooth 5.1, which is a newer version than the Helio G88’s Bluetooth 5.0. This means the Snapdragon 680 may be more efficient and offer better connectivity with Bluetooth devices. Both processors have built-in GPS and support various positioning systems, including GLONASS, NavIC, Beidou, GPS, QZSS, and Galileo.
In terms of physical connectivity, both processors support USB-C, which is a widely used standard for charging and data transfer. The differences in wireless system specifications between the Snapdragon 680 and Helio G88 may impact the performance and speed of tasks such as streaming content over Wi-Fi, connecting to Bluetooth devices, and using location-based services.
ISP – Both the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 and MediaTek Helio G88 processors come equipped with their own image signal processors (ISPs) to help capture high-quality photos and videos. The Snapdragon 680 has the Qualcomm Spectra 346 ISP, while the Helio G88 uses a Mediatek ISP.
In terms of camera capabilities, both processors support single cameras up to 64 MP, but the Snapdragon 680 has a triple camera setup capable of up to 13+13+5 MP, while the Helio G88 has a dual camera setup with 16+16 MP. Additionally, the Helio G88’s dual camera setup has the same resolution for both cameras, whereas the Snapdragon 680’s triple camera setup offers different resolutions for each camera.
When it comes to video capture, the Snapdragon 680 can capture up to 1080p at 60 FPS, while the Helio G88 can capture 2K at 30 FPS, FHD at 60 FPS, and supports H.264/HEVC/VP9 video codecs. The Snapdragon 680 uses the H.265 video codec, while the Helio G88 supports H.264, H.265, and VP9 codecs. These differences in camera and video capture capabilities between the Snapdragon 680 and Helio G88 could impact the overall image and video quality for users.
Display – The Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 and the MediaTek Helio G88 have similar display capabilities with both supporting up to 90 Hz refresh rate. However, there is a difference in the supported resolutions, with the Snapdragon 680 supporting FHD+ (1080 x 2520) and HD+ (900 x 1600), while the Helio G88 supports up to 2520 x 1080 (Full HD+) at 21:9 aspect ratio.
Overall, both processors can support high-quality displays with smooth refresh rates for an enhanced viewing experience. As for audio support, information is not provided in the given data.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 benchmark scores are impressive in various tests. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 Antutu Score is 269430 and Helio G88 Antutu Score is 229851.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 Geekbench Score, (a benchmark that measures CPU performance) for the Single-Core is 373 and the Multi-Core score is 1548, and Helio G88 Geekbench Score for the Single-Core is 363 and the Multi-Core score is 1261.
Snapdragon 680 | Helio G88 |
---|---|
Newly Launched | |
Has a smaller size (6 versus 12 nm) | |
higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2000 MHz) | |
Supports higher memory bandwidth (17.01 Gbit/s against 13.41 GB/s) | |
Better Geekbench Score | |
Better Antutu Score |
The Snapdragon 680 boasts a better specification sheet, superior performance, higher benchmark scores, and the latest technology compared to the Helio G88 processor.
These features make the Snapdragon 680 the best choice for users looking for top-of-the-line performance and advanced device capabilities.
“Make sure to check out our full comparison table for Mediatek Helio G88 Vs Sd 680 and feel free to share your feedback or suggestions with us.
Our goal at The Miraq is to provide our readers with the most informative and reliable tech resources possible.”
Manufacturer | Qualcomm Mediatek |
Announced | 27 October, 2021 15 July, 2021 |
Model | SM6225 Helio G88 |
Class | Low end Low end |
Size | 6nm 12 nm |
Cores | 8 8 |
CPU Configuration |
4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) 4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
High Frequency | 2400 MHz 2000 MHz |
Performance Core | 4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 |
Power Efficient Core | 4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) |
L1 Cache | 1 MB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 W |
Storage Type | eMMC, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1 |
GPU | Adreno 610 ARM Mali-G52 MC2 |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz 1000 MHz |
GPU Architecture | Adreno 600 Bifrost |
FLOPS | 243 Gigaflops 62 |
OpenCL Version | 2.0 2.0 |
DirectX Support | 12 12 |
Vulkan version | 1.1 1.1 |
Shading units | 128 32 |
Video Encoding |
H.264 (Advanced Video Coding (AVC)), VP9, VP8, H.265 (High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC))
H.264, H.265 / HEVC |
Video Playback |
Up to 1080p @ 60 fps H.264 (Advanced Video Coding (AVC)), VP9, VP8, H.265 (High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)) H.264, H.265 / HEVC, VP-9 |
Gaming | MediaTek HyperEngine 2.0 |
APU / NPU / AI Proc. / Neural IP | Qualcomm® Hexagon™ 686 Mediatek Neural Engine |
RAM Type | LPDDR4X LPDDR4x |
RAM frequency | 2133 MHz 1800 MHz |
RAM Max | 8 GB 8 GB |
Max Bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s 13.41 Gbit/s |
Bus Speed | 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit |
Cellular Modem | Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ X11 LTE modem Mediatek 4G Modem |
Cellular Technology |
TD-SCDMA, LTE TDD support for CBRS, LTE TDD, CDMA 1x, EV-DO, GSM/EDGE, LTE FDD, WCDMA (DC-HSDPA), WCDMA (DC-HSUPA) 4G Carrier Aggregation (CA), CDMA2000 1x/EVDO Rev. A (SRLTE), 4G FDD / TDD, HSPA + |
5G Modem | |
5G mmWave | |
5G sub-6 GHz | |
Download Speed | Up to 390 Mbps Up to 300 Mbps |
Upload Speed | Up to 150 Mbps Up to 100 Mbps |
Dual SIM |
wireless System | Qualcomm® FastConnect™ 6100 Mediatek Wireless System |
Wi-Fi Band | 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11ac Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac), |
WiFi-5 | |
WiFi-6 | |
WiFi-6E | |
Wi-Fi 7 | |
Bluetooth | Bluetooth® 5.1 Bluetooth® 5.0 |
GPS | GLONASS, NavIC, Beidou, GPS, QZSS, Galileo Beidou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS |
USB | USB-C USB-C |
NFC |
ISP | Qualcomm® Spectra™ 346 Mediatek ISP |
Single Camera | Up to 64 MP 64MP |
Multi Camera |
13+13+5 MP triple camera 16+16 MP dual camera 16MP + 16MP Dual Camera Set-up |
Video capture |
1080p @ 60 FPS
2K @ 30FPS, FHD @ 60FPS, H.264/HEVC/VP9 |
Video Codec | H.265 (High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)) H.264, H.265, VP9 |
Display Support | • FHD+ (1080 x 2520 @ 90 Hz) • HD+ (900 x 1600 @ 90 Hz) 2520 x 1080 (Full HD+) at 21:9 |
Refresh Rate | 90Hz 90Hz |
Extra Feature | - |
Audio Playback | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Bluetooth Audio | Qualcomm Aqstic™ audio codec up to Qualcomm® WCD9385 |
Security Features | Secure Boot, HW Crypto Cores, Qualcomm® Trusted Execution Environment (TEE), Trusted UI Framework, Widevine™ L1 V15 DRM, Debug Security, Qualcomm® Content Protection Framework, HW/SW storage security, HW/SW Key Management |
Fingerprint Sensor | |
Face Detection |
Charging Speed | Qualcomm® Quick Charge™ 3.0 technology |
AnTuTu benchmark scores | 269430 229851 |
Geekbench scores |
Single-Core Score - 373 Multi-Core Score - 1548 Single-Core Score - 363 Multi-Core Score - 1261 |
3DMark | 441 716 |