Apple A17 Pro Vs Exynos 2200
The Apple A17 Pro Vs Exynos 2200 Specification Comparison – These are two processors from Apple and Samsung known for their exceptional performance and efficiency. Both of these processors have been designed with advanced features and capabilities to provide users with top-notch performance and speed.
In this article, we will delve into a head-to-head comparison between two powerful processors. Join us as we explore the key features, performance capabilities, and technological advancements of the Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs A17 Pro, and examine how they stack up against each other in the fiercely competitive mobile processor landscape.”
You can also check its ranking on the Best Mobile Processor Ranking List. Additionally, you can use our Processor Comparison Tool to compare any processor to another.
Apple A17 Pro Vs Exynos 2200 Specification Comparison
When we pit the Apple A17 Pro against the Exynos 2200, it’s abundantly clear that Apple’s offering emerges as the undisputed champion. From a performance perspective, the A17 Pro’s spec sheet reads like a tech enthusiast’s dream, boasting superior CPU and GPU cores, a cutting-edge 3nm manufacturing process, and a neural engine that can execute a staggering 35 trillion operations per second.
In the realm of benchmarks, the A17 Pro’s prowess is equally evident, consistently outclassing its competitors.
While the Exynos 2200 is undoubtedly a capable contender, it faces an uphill battle to match the sheer might of the A17 Pro. In the quest for mobile processing supremacy, Apple’s A17 Pro stands as a shining testament to innovation and performance, setting the bar higher than ever before.
To further explore its capabilities, you can refer to the Best Mobile Processor Ranking List and utilize our Processor Comparison Tool.
“Make sure to check out our full comparison table for Apple A17 Pro Vs Exynos 2200 and feel free to share your feedback or suggestions with us.
Our goal at The Miraq is to provide our readers with the most informative and reliable tech resources possible.”
Apple A17 Pro Vs Exynos 2200 Which is the Best?
we have Apple’s A17 Pro, a powerhouse that has raised the bar for performance, specs, benchmark standards and completely dominance over Exynos 2200.
Info
| Manufacturer | Apple Samsung |
| Announced | 13 September, 2023 18 January, 2022 |
| Model | A17 Pro Exynos 2200 |
| Class | Flagship Flagship |
CPU
| Size | 3nm TSMC 4nm |
| Cores | 6‑core CPU 8 |
| CPU Configuration |
10% faster - CPU 2x 3.7 GHz – performance and 4x 2.02 GHz efficiency cores 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x and 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| High Frequency | 3700 MHz 2800 MHz |
| Performance Core | 2x 3.7 GHz 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 |
| Power Efficient Core | 4x 2.02 GHz 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A ARMv9-A |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 16 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 8 W 10 W |
| Storage Type | NVMe UFS v3.1 |
| Extra Feature |
Transistor count 19 billion |
GPU
| GPU | Apple A17 (6‑core GPU) Xclipse 920 |
| GPU frequency | 1398 MHz 1300 MHz |
| GPU Architecture | Apple GPU AMD RDNA 2 |
| FLOPS | 2147.2 Gigaflops |
| OpenCL Version | 2.0 2.0 |
| DirectX Support | 12 12 |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 1.1 |
| Shading units | 128 384 |
| Video Encoding |
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Video Playback |
HEVC, H.264 and ProRes HDR with Dolby Vision, HDR10 and HLG 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS |
| Gaming | Ray tracing |
NPU
| APU / NPU / AI Proc. / Neural IP | Apple 16‑core Neural Engine Samsung FP16 Neural Engine |
| TOPS Speed | 35 trillion operations per second |
| Extra Feature |
20% faster GPU 4x faster ray tracing than A16 Bionic 2x faster Neural Engine |
Memory
| RAM Type | LPDDR5 LPDDR5 |
| RAM frequency | 3200 MHz 3200 MHz |
| RAM Max | 8 GB 24 GB |
| Max Bandwidth | 51.2 gigabytes / second 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Bus Speed | 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit |
Connectivity
| Cellular Modem | Snapdragon X70 5G modem Samsung 5G Modem |
| Cellular Technology |
G NR (Bands n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n20, n25, n26, n28, n30, n38, n40, n41, n48, n53, n66, n70, n77, n78, n79) FDD-LTE (Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 66) TD-LTE (Bands 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 53) UMTS/HSPA+/DC-HSDPA (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz) GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) 5G NR Sub-6GHz 5.1Gbps (DL) / 2.55 Gbps (UL) 5G NR mmWave 7.35Gbps (DL) / 3.67 Gbps (UL) LTE Cat.24 8CA 3Gbps (DL) / Cat.22 4CA 422Mbps (UL) |
| 5G Modem | |
| 5G Network | 5G (sub‑6 GHz) with 4x4 MIMO5 Gigabit LTE with 4x4 MIMO and LAA5 5G NR Sub-6GH, 5G NR Sub-6GHz |
| 5G mmWave | |
| 5G sub-6 GHz | |
| Download Speed | Up to 10 Gbps Up to 7.35Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 3.5 Gbps Up to 3.67 Gbps |
| Dual SIM |
Wireless System
| wireless System | Apple wireless System Samsung Wireless System |
| Wi-Fi Band | Wi‑Fi 6E (802.11ax) with 2x2 MIMO6 Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| WiFi-5 | |
| WiFi-6 | |
| WiFi-6E | |
| Wi-Fi 7 | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 Bluetooth® 5.2 |
| GPS | Precision dual-frequency GPS (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou and NavIC), iBeacon micro-location GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC |
| USB | USB-C USB-C, USB 3.1 |
| NFC | |
| Extra Feature |
Digital compass Second-generation Ultra Wideband chip NFC with reader mode Express Cards with power reserve |
ISP
| ISP | Apple ISP Samsung ISP |
| Single Camera | 48MP 200MP |
| Multi Camera | 12MP + 12MP 64MP+ 32MP |
| Video capture |
4K video recording at 24 fps, 25 fps, 30 fps or 60 fps 1080p HD video recording at 25 fps, 30 fps or 60 fps and 120 fps Cinematic mode up to 4K HDR at 30 fps HDR video recording with Dolby Vision up to 4K at 60 fps ProRes video recording up to 4K at 60 fps with external recording 4K HDR, 4K @120, 8K @30 4K @240 and 8K @60 |
| Video Codec | HEVC, H.264 and ProRes, ACES, H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
Display and Audio Support
| Display Support | 2796x1290 4K/WQUXGA @120Hz and QHD+ @144Hz |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz Up to 144Hz |
| Audio Playback | upported formats include AAC, MP3, Apple Lossless, FLAC, Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus and Dolby Atmos Spatial Audio playback User‑configurable maximum volume limit AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Bluetooth Audio | AAC, MP3, Apple Lossless, FLAC, Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus and Dolby Atmos Spatial Audio playback |
Security
| Security Features | Face ID Samsung Knox |
| Fingerprint Sensor | |
| Face Detection |
Charging
| Charging Speed | 15W wireless, 25W wired |
Benchmarks
| AnTuTu benchmark scores | 1480302 944281 |
| Geekbench scores |
Single-Core Score - 2934 Multi-Core Score - 7374 Geekbench 6 Score Single-Core Score - 1145 Multi-Core Score - 3558 |
| 3DMark | 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited 15,399/92fps and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited 3,481/20fps 6532 |
|
Recent Compares
-
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 Vs Snapdragon 780G
View Comparison →
-
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 Vs Snapdragon 782G
View Comparison →
-
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 Vs Snapdragon 855 Plus
View Comparison →
-
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 Vs Snapdragon 855
View Comparison →
-
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 Vs Snapdragon 860
View Comparison →
-
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 Vs Snapdragon 865
View Comparison →
